Religion and science must work together on behalf of the environmental movement

Autores

  • Heslley Silva Centro Universitário de Formiga (UNIFOR/MG) e Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG)

Resumo

environmental issues are on the agenda around the world; however, many conservative governments have developed erratic, inadequate, or even counterproductive policies on these issues. These governments typically have broad support from particular religious groups, reinforced by the dissemination of misinformation about environmental threats, especially through the Internet. It is proposed that, in order to establish sound environmental policy, science must have religion as an ally, so it must be demonstrated that religious texts indicate the need to harmonize with nature, especially in Christian belief groups. Science can make evidence-based information on environmental threats available, and religion can make its force and social energy available to help to mobilize appropriate environmental policy.

DOi.png 10.29327/256659.14.2-12

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Heslley Silva, Centro Universitário de Formiga (UNIFOR/MG) e Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG)

Pós-doutor em Educação e Ciência pela Universidade do Minho, Portugal (2016). Doutor em Educação na Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2015), programa Latino-americano e linha de pesquisa Educação e Ciência, possui mestrado em Educação pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2000), com especialização em Biotecnologia pela Universidade Federal de Lavras e especialização em Biologia Celular e Molecular pela Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto. Atualmente é professor Titular I e pesquisador do Centro Universitário de Formiga/MG (UNIFOR/MG). E-mail: heslley@uniformg.edu.br

Referências

ALMEIDA, R. DE. Bolsonaro Presidente: Conservadorismo, Evangelismo e a Crise Brasileira. Novos Estudos - CEBRAP, v. 38, n. 1, p. 185–213, 2019.

ALMIRON, N.; XIFRA, J. Climate Change Denial and Public Relations: Strategic communication and interest groups in climate inaction. [S.l.]: Routledge, 2019.

BOMBERG, E. Environmental politics in the Trump era: an early assessment. Environmental Politics, v. 26, n. 5, p. 956–963, 2017.

CHAPRON, G.; EPSTEIN, Y.; LÓPEZ-BAO, J. V. A rights revolution for nature. Science, v. 363, n. 6434, p. 1392 LP-1393, 29 mar. 2019. Disponível em: <http://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6434/1392.abstract>.

DI MARCO, M. et al. Changes in human footprint drive changes in species extinction risk. Nature communications, v. 9, n. 1, p. 4621, 2018.

DUNLAP, R. E.; JACQUES, P. J. Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection. The American behavioral scientist, v. 57, n. 6, p. 699–731, jun. 2013. Disponível em: <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098056>.

ESCOBAR, H. Brazilian president attacks deforestation data. Science, v. 365, n. 6452, p. 419 LP-419, 2 ago. 2019. Disponível em: <http://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6452/419.abstract>.

FARRELL, J. The growth of climate change misinformation in US philanthropy: evidence from natural language processing. Environmental Research Letters, 2018.

GILROY, R. The anti-vaccination movement: a concern for public health. Practice Nursing, v. 30, n. 5, p. 248–249, 2019.

MACE, G. M. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nature Sustainability, v. 1, n. 9, p. 448–451, 2018. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0130-0>.

NEGI, C. S. Religion and biodiversity conservation: not a mere analogy. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, v. 1, n. 2, p. 85–96, 2005.

REINBOLD, J. “Honorable Religious Premises” and Other Affronts: Disputing Free Exercise in the Era of Trump. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society. [S.l.]: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019. p. 31–54.

SELBY, J. The Trump presidency, climate change, and the prospect of a disorderly energy transition. Review of International Studies, v. 45, n. 3, p. 471–490, 2019.

SILVA, H. M. Information and misinformation about climate change: lessons from Brazil. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, v. 22, p. 51–56, 2022.

SILVA, H. M. Wildfires and Brazilian irrationality on social networks. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, v. 21, p. 11–15, 2021. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esep00194>.

VALENZUELA, J. J. et al. Ocean acidification conditions increase resilience of marine diatoms. Nature communications, v. 9, n. 1, p. 2328, 2018.

Downloads

Publicado

14-11-2023

Como Citar

Silva, H. (2023). Religion and science must work together on behalf of the environmental movement. PLURA, Revista De Estudos De Religião / PLURA, Journal for the Study of Religion, 14(2), 216–222. Recuperado de https://revistaplura.emnuvens.com.br/plura/article/view/2133

Edição

Seção

Comunicações / Papers-Comunications